By Chloe Beaufoy
What’s Happening?
In April 2025, Turkey’s Health Ministry introduced a new regulation banning elective Caesarean sections in private hospitals and clinics. The rule applies to all non-medically necessary C-sections, meaning that unless there’s a clinical reason, women must give birth naturally.
This policy is part of President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s larger push to increase Turkey’s birth rate, which has been steadily declining. In 2023, the fertility rate dropped to 1.51 children per woman, well below the replacement level of 2.1. As part of this pronatalist agenda, Erdoğan declared 2025 the “Year of the Family,” urging couples to have at least three children.
The government also pointed to Turkey’s exceptionally high C-section rate as justification for the ban. In 2023, 61.5% of births were performed via C-section, the highest among all OECD countries. Health officials argue that this overreliance on surgical births poses long-term health risks to both mothers and babies. The new policy aims to shift medical practices toward prioritizing vaginal deliveries, which they claim are safer and more in line with “natural” family-building.
Public Reactions: Voices For and Against
Supporters of the Ban:
- Health Minister Kemal Memişoğlu: defended the ban, stating that “normal birth is what’s natural,” and emphasized that C-sections should be used only when medically necessary.
- President Erdoğan: framed the policy within his broader pro-family agenda, linking natural birth to national well-being and demographic sustainability.
- Some medical professionals support the move, arguing that limiting elective C-sections could improve maternal and infant health outcomes.
- Conservative media outlets have praised the ban, framing it as a return to traditional values and a rejection of what they view as excessive medical intervention.
- Certain members of the public back the decision, believing that natural childbirth should be the norm unless complications arise.
Opponents of the Ban:
1. Gökçe Gökçen, deputy chair of the opposition CHP party, condemned the ban with a blunt message: “Keep your hands off women’s bodies.”
2. Women’s rights groups argue that the law strips women of autonomy and treats reproductive health as a political tool.
3. The Turkish Medical Association warns that the policy could endanger women, especially in rural or underserved areas, by limiting access to necessary procedures.
4. International observers see the ban as part of a growing trend of state control over women’s reproductive choices in Turkey.
5. Social media users have reacted with frustration and sarcasm. One widely shared post read: “Male football players are telling women how to give birth,” in response to a government campaign promoting natural delivery.
What I Think
Turkey’s ban on elective C-sections raises serious concerns about reproductive freedom and government overreach. Yes, the high C-section rate deserves attention.
But banning a medical option outright, regardless of personal preference or circumstance risks doing more harm than good.
This policy doesn’t just reflect a desire to reduce surgical births; it reflects a deeper pattern of the state interfering in private health decisions. The message is clear: demographic goals are being placed above individual rights. That’s a dangerous precedent.
Instead of restrictions, the government should invest in better prenatal care, evidence-based education, and access to trustworthy medical advice. These are the tools that empower women to make informed choices and not sweeping laws that limit their options.
Natural birth may be ideal in many cases, but it shouldn’t be mandated. Every pregnancy is different. Every woman deserves the right to choose what’s best for her body and her baby.
